Exploring, Learning, Growing and Loving Life

In the life long journey of being human we need to share what we are learning to further each other's journey. Here I share my musings, learnings and convictions.

Monday, February 28, 2011

Eye Allergies

Eye allergies


Dr Adrian Morris



Eye allergies can vary from mild irritation of the conjunctiva - the membrane that covers the eyeball - to severe conjunctival inflammation with corneal scarring.

Dr Adrian Morris last medically reviewed this article in September 2007.

First published in September 1999.

Hay fever eyes

Seasonal allergic conjunctivitis is the eye equivalent of hay fever and affects up to 25 per cent of the general population. The eyes become itchy, watery and red in the summer pollen season, usually from exposure to grass and tree pollen.

Vernal conjunctivitis is a more severe form of this disease seen in children. The eyes are sticky with a stringy discharge, and it's painful, especially when opening the eyes on waking.

The inner membranes of the eyelid swell and the conjunctiva develops a cobblestone appearance. Corneal damage may occur if the condition is left untreated.

Perennial allergic conjunctivitis tends to occur all year round, with house dust mite and cat allergies. The symptoms are usually milder than those in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.

Top

Eczema eyes

Although rare, atopic keratoconjunctivitis is the most severe manifestation of allergic eye disease. It occurs predominantly in adult males and is the eye equivalent of severe eczema.

This persistent condition results in constant itching, dry eyes and blurred vision. It's associated with corneal swelling and scarring. Eyelid eczema and infection are common, and lens cataracts may develop over time.

Top

Contact lens allergy

Contact lens wearers may develop giant papillary conjunctivitis, triggered by constant local irritation by the contact lenses on the conjunctival surfaces. The lining of the upper eyelid is usually most affected. Disposable contact lenses may help settle symptoms, but occasionally wearing contact lens has to be suspended.

Never use steroid eye drops unless under the direct supervision of a doctor. Although they're effective for treating eye allergies, they can lead to unwanted side-effects such as glaucoma and cataract formation.

They may also encourage infections of the eye, with resultant corneal scarring.


Eye allergy treatments

Regular use of anti-allergy eye drops such as sodium chromoglycate, nedocromil, olopatidine and lodoxamide can help to treat mild seasonal disease.

Non-sedating oral antihistamines - cetirizine, loratadine, mizolastine and fexofenadine - can also help, especially when there's an associated nasal allergy.

Corticosteroid eye drops occasionally have to be used for more severe eye allergies, but this should be for short periods only.

Friday, February 25, 2011

List of Academy Award Nominees

And The Nominees Are...


For those who haven't been obsessively following the results of the Golden Globes, here's a refresher on which films and performers are in the running to take home a coveted gold statue:

Best Picture:

127 Hours

Black Swan

Inception

The Fighter

The Kids Are All Right

The King’s Speech

The Social Network

Toy Story 3

True Grit

Winter’s Bone

Best Actor

Javier Bardem, Biutiful

Jeff Bridges, True Grit

Jesse Eisenberg, The Social Network

Colin Firth, The King’s Speech

James Franco, 127 Hours

Best Actress

Annette Bening, The Kids Are All Right

Nicole Kidman, Rabbit Hole

Jennifer Lawrence, Winter’s Bone

Natalie Portman, Black Swan

Michelle Williams, Blue Valentine

Best Supporting Actor

Christian Bale, The Fighter

John Hawkes, Winter’s Bone

Jeremy Renner, The Town

Mark Ruffalo, The Kids Are All Right

Geoffrey Rush, The King’s Speech

Best Supporting Actress

Amy Adams, The Fighter

Helena Bonham Carter, The King’s Speech

Melissa Leo, The Fighter

Hailee Steinfeld, True Grit

Jacki Weaver, Animal Kingdom

Best Director

Darren Aronofsky, Black Swan

Joel & Ethan Coen, True Grit

David Fincher, The Social Network

Tom Hooper, The King’s Speech

David O. Russell, The Fighter

Best Original Screenplay

Another Year, written by Mike Leigh

The Fighter, Screenplay by Scott Silver and Paul Tamasy & Eric Johnson; 
Story by Keith Dorrington & Paul Tamasy & Eric Johnson

Inception, written by Christopher Nolan

The Kids Are All Right, written by Lisa Cholodenko & Stuart Blumberg

The King’s Speech, Screenplay by David Seidler

Best Adapted Screenplay

127 Hours, Screenplay by Danny Boyle & Simon Beaufoy

The Social Network, Screenplay by Aaron Sorkin

Toy Story 3, Screenplay by Michael Arndt; Story by John Lasseter, Andrew Stanton and Lee Unkrich

True Grit, Written for the screen by Joel Coen & Ethan Coen

Winter’s Bone, Adapted for the screen by Debra Granik & Anne Rosellini

Best Animated Film

How to Train Your Dragon

The Illusionist

Toy Story 3

Best Documentary

Exit Through the Gift Shop, Banksy and Jaimie D’Cruz

Gasland, Josh Fox and Trish Adlesic

Inside Job, Charles Ferguson and Audrey Marrs

Restrepo, Tim Hetherington and Sebastian Junger

Waste Land, Lucy Walker and Angus Aynley

Best Foreign Film

Hors la Loi (Outside the Law) (Algeria)

Incendies (Canada)

In a Better World (Denmark)

Dogtooth (Greece)

Biutiful (Mexico)

Best Score

127 Hours, A.R. Rahman

How to Train Your Dragon, John Powell

Inception, Hans Zimmer

The King’s Speech, Alexandre Desplat

The Social Network, Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross

Best Original Song

“Coming Home,” Country Strong, Tom Douglas, Troy Verges and Hillary Lindsey

“I See the Light,” Tangled, Alan Menken, Glenn Slater

“If I Rise,” 127 Hours, A.R. Rahman, Dido, Rollo Armstrong

“We Belong Together,” Toy Story 3, Randy Newman



Thursday, February 24, 2011

What is VRE and how do you get it?

What is VRE?

VRE is Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci. Enterococci are bacteria that are

commonly found in the stomach and bowels of 95% of the population. They can

also be found in the mouth, throat, and vagina. These bacteria rarely cause

illness in healthy people. However, when VRE gets into open wounds and skin

sores, they can cause infections in the wounds. Occasionally, VRE can also

cause more serious infections of the blood or other body tissues.



Vancomycin is an antibiotic used to treat serious infections. This drug is also

used to treat enterococci because these bacteria are resistant to many other

drugs. Resistant means that a drug is not effective in treating the bacteria or

infection. Sometimes bacteria, such as enterococci, become resistant to Vancomycin and the drug no longer works. When this happens, it becomes more

difficult to treat the enterococcal infection.



Who gets VRE?

People at risk for developing VRE are those who have had experience with:

• A long-term illness

• The need for taking many different types of antibiotics

• Major surgery

• An organ or bone marrow transplant.

• Problems with their immune system.



How is VRE spread?



VRE is most commonly spread by direct hand contact with an infected person.

VRE is also spread by touching surfaces, such as railings, faucets, or door

handles that have been contaminated by someone infected with the bacteria.

Hand washing is critical to prevent the spread of VRE.



How is VRE treated?



Healthy people who carry VRE in their bodies do not need treatment. Those with

serious VRE infections will be treated with other antibiotics.



What happens in the hospital?



Because VRE is spread by physical contact, special precautions must be taken

to prevent the spread of these bacteria to other patients. Patients with VRE

infections are placed in single rooms. All health care workers who enter the room must wear a gown and gloves to prevent the spread of VRE to other patients. Before leaving the room, they wash their hands or use the alcohol gel provided. In addition, the patient’s activities are restricted to his/her room except to leave for medical purposes such as procedures or emergencies.



Is it safe to visit a person with VRE?



Because healthy people are at very little risk of getting infected with VRE, it is

safe to visit when in good health. It is recommended that visitors refrain from

visiting if they are not feeling well or are caring for sick individuals at home. It is

also recommended that infants and young children refrain from visiting. Persons

who are sick or have a weak immune system should not visit.



Visitors do not have to wear gowns and gloves, but it is important that

visitors wash their hands thoroughly before and after contact with the

patient and the patient’s environment, and before leaving the room.

Visitors should also refrain from visiting other patients in the hospital after

leaving the room of a patient infected with VRE.





How is VRE prevented?



Hand washing is the most important thing to do to prevent the spread of

VRE. The key times to wash hands are:



• When soiled

• Before and after eating, drinking, smoking, or applying personal care

products

• Before and after using the toilet

• After contact with someone infected with VRE or with the infected person’s

environment.

• It is also important to do cleaning with regular household cleaners

because these bacteria are found in bathroom facilities.



How can I get more information?

If you have questions about VRE information is also available at:



• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention @ www.cdc.gov



• Association of Medical Microbiologists @ www.amm.co.uk



• Johns Hopkins Epidemiology & Infection Control @ www.hopkins-heic.org

Ludwig Wittgenstein Quote

Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Sitting is killing you

Sitting is killing you




These symptoms are all normal, and they're not good. They may well be caused by doing precisely what you're doing—sitting. New research in the diverse fields of epidemiology, molecular biology, biomechanics, and physiology is converging toward a startling conclusion: Sitting is a public-health risk. And exercising doesn't offset it. "People need to understand that the qualitative mechanisms of sitting are completely different from walking or exercising," says University of Missouri microbiologist Marc Hamilton. "Sitting too much is not the same as exercising too little. They do completely different things to the body."

In a 2005 article in Science magazine, James A. Levine, an obesity specialist at the Mayo Clinic, pinpointed why, despite similar diets, some people are fat and others aren't. "We found that people with obesity have a natural predisposition to be attracted to the chair, and that's true even after obese people lose weight," he says. "What fascinates me is that humans evolved over 1.5 million years entirely on the ability to walk and move. And literally 150 years ago, 90% of human endeavor was still agricultural. In a tiny speck of time we've become chair-sentenced," Levine says.

Hamilton, like many sitting researchers, doesn't own an office chair. "If you're standing around and puttering, you recruit specialized muscles designed for postural support that never tire," he says. "They're unique in that the nervous system recruits them for low-intensity activity and they're very rich in enzymes." One enzyme, lipoprotein lipase, grabs fat and cholesterol from the blood, burning the fat into energy while shifting the cholesterol from LDL (the bad kind) to HDL (the healthy kind). When you sit, the muscles are relaxed, and enzyme activity drops by 90% to 95%, leaving fat to camp out in the bloodstream. Within a couple hours of sitting, healthy cholesterol plummets by 20%.

The data back him up. Older people who move around have half the mortality rate of their peers. Frequent TV and Web surfers (sitters) have higher rates of hypertension, obesity, high blood triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and high blood sugar, regardless of weight. Lean people, on average, stand for two hours longer than their counterparts.

The chair you're sitting in now is likely contributing to the problem. "Short of sitting on a spike, you can't do much worse than a standard office chair," says Galen Cranz, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley. She explains that the spine wasn't meant to stay for long periods in a seated position. Generally speaking, the slight S shape of the spine serves us well. "If you think about a heavy weight on a C or S, which is going to collapse more easily? The C," she says. But when you sit, the lower lumbar curve collapses, turning the spine's natural S-shape into a C, hampering the abdominal and back musculature that support the body. The body is left to slouch, and the lateral and oblique muscles grow weak and unable to support it.

This, in turn, causes problems with other parts of the body. "When you're standing, you're bearing weight through the hips, knees, and ankles," says Dr. Andrew C, Hecht, co-chief of spinal surgery at Mount Sinai Medical Center. "When you're sitting, you're bearing all that weight through the pelvis and spine, and it puts the highest pressure on your back discs. Looking at MRIs, even sitting with perfect posture causes serious pressure on your back."

Much of the perception about what makes for healthy and comfortable sitting has come from the chair industry, which in the 1960s and '70s started to address widespread complaints of back pain from workers. A chief cause of the problem, companies publicized, was a lack of lumbar support. But lumbar support doesn't actually help your spine. "You cannot design your way around this problem," says Cranz. "But the idea of lumbar support has become so embedded in people's conception of comfort, not their actual experience on chairs. We are, in a sense, locked into it."

In the past three decades the U.S. swivel chair has tripled into a more than $3 billion market served by more than 100 companies. Unsurprisingly, America's best-selling chair has made a fetish of lumbar support. The basic Aeron, by Herman Miller, costs around $700, and many office workers swear by them. There are also researchers who doubt them. "The Aeron is far too low," says Dr. A.C. Mandal, a Danish doctor who was among the first to raise flags about sitting 50 years ago. "I visited Herman Miller a few years ago, and they did understand. It should have much more height adjustment, and you should be able to move more. But as long as they sell enormous numbers, they don't want to change it." Don Chadwick, the co-designer of the Aeron, says he wasn't hired to design the ideal product for an eight-hour-workday; he was hired to update Herman Miller's previous best-seller. "We were given a brief and basically told to design the next-generation office chair," he says.

The best sitting alternative is perching—a half-standing position at barstool height that keeps weight on the legs and leaves the S-curve intact. Chair alternatives include the Swopper, a hybrid stool seat and the funky, high HAG Capisco chair. Standing desks and chaise longues are good options. Ball chairs, which bounce your spine into a C-shape, are not. The biggest obstacle to healthy sitting may be ourselves. Says Jackie Maze, the vice-president for marketing at Keilhauer: "Most customers still want chairs that look like chairs."

Recently Levine talked to Best Buy (BBY), Wal-Mart (WMT), and Salo accounting about letting him design their offices and keep people walking and working as much as possible. Levine jerry-rigged an old 1- to 2-mph treadmill to stand under a desk and put a handful of them in conference rooms. Those who wanted could have walking desks in their offices, and he partnered with Steelcase to manufacture a $4,500 version of the machine. "Within two weeks, people basically get addicted to walking and working," says Levine. "You just need to give them the chance."

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

How to register an effective complaint


How to Complain Properly

The rules of effective complaining are pretty simple:

• Only make a thoroughly educated and informed complaint. Do not complain unless you've considered the other side and you're fully confident in your complaint.

• Never be an asshole. You are dealing with real people with real feelings, and your anger is rarely their fault.

• Make few demands and ask a lot of questions.

Every one of these items is vital to an effective complaint. You're walking in unprepared by only knowing your own side of the argument, shooting yourself in the foot by being a jerk, and backing yourself into a corner by making several demands. Let's look at why.

Be Informed



It should go without saying that preparing for a debate is better than walking in unprepared, without facts or any information to back up your claims. Complaining to a company, your city, or whomever, is essentially a debate and you'll hurt your argument if you're not properly informed.

When the idea of complaining pops into your mind the first time, it's generally an emotional response. Maybe you've just been billed by your health care provider for something they should cover and you're angry. Maybe you've just been denied a warranty-promised repair for your computer because the manufacturer insists that the problem is a result of user damage when you know it isn't. Whatever the case may be, you simply cannot win your side without considering where the other side is coming from. You can think of it as knowing thy enemy if you want, but often times the other side has a reasonable point. You may even find by considering their point that you're actually in the wrong. Complaining when you're in the wrong is just a bad, bad thing to do, so this is an important step. If it strengthens your argument, you'll be in much better shape. If it weakens your argument, you can be the good guy and take responsibility.



How do you become informed about your complaint? You need to do two things: play devil's advocate and research similar complaints made in the past. Devil's advocate is an easy process since all you really need to do is debate with yourself. Think about why the other side might argue against your complaint and act like they're right. Come up with the best arguments they have against why they should help you and prepare your rebuttals. Researching previous complaints is also very easy. You have access to the internet, after all, and can simply search for terms that describe the situation you're in or the problem you're having. Much like in a court of law, you gain an advantage if you can discover a precedent that points to you being in the right. If a person's hard drive failed a day after the warranty expired and the manufacturer replaced it, you can probably convince the manufacturer to help you out due to the unfortunate circumstances. Technically they're not required to help, but it never hurts to ask politely in a situation where it's really in your best interest and theirs to help you out (since it will make you a very happy customer).

Don't Be a Jerk



Photo by Denis Dervisevic

When you want to complain, generally the emotion attached to that complaint is anger. Anger is a powerful motivator, but it's terrible and useless in an argument. Anger just breeds more anger, and that heightened emotional state prevents you, as well as the person you're complaining to, from seeing logic and reason. Plus, nobody wants to help a huge asshole.

Having worked in customer support before, I can tell you that nobody on the other end of the line wants to give you disappointing news. The hardest part of the job for me was saying "no" to customers when I wanted to help them. I wanted to help the customer so much that I'd generally work overtime—for which I wasn't paid—to do so. This was more common than not in our organization, but we only did it for the nice customers. If you were mean, you went right to the bottom of the priority pile.

That said, not every customer support team is filled with people who want to sacrifice their free time to help you. Many customer support representatives work for corporations that don't care about them, don't help them do their job better, and have customers who are more often angry than not. Furthermore, the majority of those representatives are not trained in conflict resolution and will simply get mad when you're rude to them. While you shouldn't be rude, the unfortunate reality is that being yourself isn't necessarily going to help either. Often times you have to approach these conversations acting the opposite of the way you feel. Chances are you're really angry, but you have to call in and be cheerful. This is very hard to do, and I'll be the first to admit that I can't always do it. Sometimes I am just so frustrated that I can't hide it. Nonetheless, you should never be a jerk. It is not the customer support representative's fault that you're having the problem and their job is to help you. Be nice to them and they will. It's okay to be firm about the resolution you want, but you should always be kind.

Avoid Demands, Focus on Questions



Although you shouldn't be vague about what you want, it's often best to prime the representative to feel more like they're on your side. We've previously posted about how a simple question can help you get better results with your complaints, and it's very true. If you're feeling like you're stuck at a dead end and not getting anywhere with a customer service rep, often times you can move forward by asking him what he would do if he were in your position. You can also ask what kind of resolution he thinks is fair, how he thinks this problem can best be solved, and anything else that can (politely) help a customer service representative understand what it's like for you. In some cases you'll need to ask to escalate the issue to a superior—which is often what needs to happen in order to get the resolution you want in the first place, so don't be afraid to ask—but often times you can get where you want to be by simply getting the customer support representative to think about where you're coming from.

While questions are important, you don't want to lose sight of your goal. It is perfectly fine to state your ideal resolution during the call. What you want to avoid is making demands. It's okay to say "this is what I'd like to see happen," followed by an outline of your ideal resolution in a concise and polite fashion. What's not okay is to demand that you get this or that with an implied "or else." Demands kill a negotiation and make you an unreasonable, hostile person. Just because you don't demand something doesn't mean you won't get it. When you make a demand, the other side will feel they've heard everything they need to hear. They know the only condition you're willing to accept and will act accordingly. If you're willing to discuss the situation politely, you're more likely to get what you want. This way you have an opportunity to argue why what you want is the most fair and a lesser resolution won't work. Demands take all of those options off the table.

Where to File Your Complaints





For the majority of complaints, you can simply call a customer support phone number, write an email or letter, or just show up in person. Unless you're ridiculously unpleasant (which you probably are not), you'll always have better luck in person. So much of our communication is informed with body language, so you give yourself a huge advantage by showing up in person and kindly asking for your ideal resolution. This isn't always an option, however, so you want to pick the mode of communication that's the closest alternative. Often times this is a phone call, so always opt for the phone instead of email or online chat when your complaint will require some back-and-forth. If you're making a simple complaint that won't require much discussion (if any), you can generally resolve that easily over email. Waiting on hold for customer service can be annoying, however, so we tend to avoid phone calls. Simply put: don't. There are tools like LucyPhone that can take the pain out of waiting and wading through customer support menus so you don't have to deal with them.

Sometimes complaining directly to the company will get you nowhere. There is no strategy you can have that will always be effective. It is inevitable that you'll encounter an awful person on the other end of the line, or in person, and have to bring your complaint elsewhere. When I first moved to Los Angeles, I had such a problem. Aside from an awful flight, my bag was broken into by a TSA agent. When I went to report the theft, before I even knew what had happened, I was berated and belittled by the woman at the baggage office for absolutely no reason. She was one of the most needlessly cruel people I have ever encountered. Oddly, her name was Joyce. This flight was on Virgin America and it wasn't the first significant problem I'd had with the airline. When I tried contacting other members of the airline to complain about the flight, I didn't receive a response. Rather than giving up, I contacted the Consumerist and they published my story. Two days later I heard from Virgin American and they resolved everything very fairly. I've since only had great experiences with the airline.

Consumer rights blogs are one good way to complain, but another great avenue is Twitter. Many businesses have dedicated customer support Twitter accounts that go out of their way to find and help angry customers who have tweeted their problems. This route is not always effective, but I've seen great results with my cable company and a few software companies. If your complaint is effectively ignored through traditional means, try utilizing social media. They'd prefer to keep your negative experience out of the public space, so it can be more effective than you might think.

When you're complaining about a U.S. government organization, like the Post Office, the Consumerist suggests that submitting a complaint to the Office of Public Affairs & Government Relations can be useful. If you're complaining about a non-Government business, however, the Better Business Bureau is where you'd want to file your complaint.

If you need help writing a complaint letter, be sure to check out our complaint letter template.

What to Do When Your Complaints Are Ignored

If none of these options work out, you may want to consider if this complaint is really worth the effort you've put into it. If you're really getting screwed, your next steps may be legal action. (On the other hand, you could always try something more creative.) You'll need to consult a legal professional for advice on whether or not such action is warranted, but sometimes even if you're in the right and your complaint remains unheard, you're still better off letting it go. Always consider the importance of the resolution. While your principals may seem like the most important thing, if you're getting very little you're often better off letting the complaint go and taking your business elsewhere.

Monday, February 21, 2011

Cholesterol 'does not predict stroke in women'

Cholesterol levels do not predict stroke in women, say scientists.

High levels of cholesterol do not predict the risk of stroke in women, according to researchers in Denmark.
They did detect an increased risk in men, but only when cholesterol was at almost twice the average level.
The report in Annals of Neurology recommends using a different type of fat in the blood, non-fasting triglycerides, to measure the risk. The Stroke Association said triglyceride tests needed to become routine to reduce the risk of stroke.A total of 150,000 people have a stroke in the UK each year. Most are ischemic strokes, in which a clot in an artery disrupts the brain's blood supply.The research followed 13,951 men and women, who took part in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.During the 33-year study, 837 men and 837 women had strokes.

“This study highlights the importance of measuring triglycerides routinely in order to reduce a person's risk of stroke." Dr Peter Coleman

Poor predictor
They reported that the cholesterol levels in women were not associated with stroke, while there was only an association in men with levels higher than 9mmol/litre. The average in UK men is 5.5.
The researchers at Copenhagen University Hospital said this was "difficult to explain" as LDL, or bad, cholesterol is known to cause atherosclerosis which can block arteries.

They did notice a link, in both men and women, between the risk of stroke and non-fasting triglycerides.
They believe these fats are a marker for "remnant cholesterol" which is left behind when other forms of cholesterol are made.

Dr Peter Coleman, deputy director of research at The Stroke Association said: "Tests for triglyceride levels aren't routinely carried out in the UK unless there is significant concern."
"We know that high levels of fats, such as cholesterol, increase your risk of having a stroke. However, this research shows the importance of measuring the fat triglyceride, as well as cholesterol.

"This study highlights the importance of measuring triglycerides routinely in order to reduce a person's risk of stroke."

Sunday, February 20, 2011

10 Superfoods for Heart Disease

Nutritious foods for lower cholesterol and a healthy heart.

By Dorie Eisenstein

Heart disease is the leading cause of death among women and men in the United States. We all know a healthy diet can help reduce your risk, especially when coupled with regular exercise and maintaining a reasonable weight. But what really are the best foods to include on your weekly menu to keep your heart healthy and strong?

"When it comes to prevention, increasing total dietary fiber and unsaturated fats is the way to go," according to Linda Van Horn, PhD, registered dietitian (RD), member of the American Heart Association's nutrition committee, and professor of Preventive Medicine at Northwestern Medical School in Chicago.

Eating unsaturated fats, like omega-3 fatty acids and olive oil, can help to reduce triglycerides, which inhibit blood from clotting and our arteries from becoming clogged with plaque. And a diet rich in soluble fiber, which is often found in legumes and some fruits and vegetables, helps to lower your LDL cholesterol. Here are 10 foods that are rich in heart-healthy nutrients.



Sardines

Although these little fish tend to have a bad reputation, they are a great source of omega-3 fatty acids, along with calcium and niacin. Try them fresh on the grill or use canned sardines packed in oil on salads, in sandwiches, or in sauces.

Recommended serving size: Fresh, 3 whole sardines: 281 calories Canned in oil, 3.5 ounces drained: 220 calories



Oatmeal

If you're looking for a comforting breakfast, start your day off with oatmeal for an instant boost of fiber. Oatmeal also has a low glycemic index, which helps to provide lasting energy and keeps hunger at bay. Look for rolled oats, and add some raisins, apples, and honey for flavor. Try to avoid instant oatmeal, since it is loaded with sugars that you don't need.

Recommended serving size: Raw, 1/3 cup: 113 calories Made with water, heaping 3/4 cup: 98 calories



Mackerel

Sick of salmon, but always eating it for the health benefit? Try mackerel instead. An excellent source of omega-3s, mackerel is also packed with the antioxidant mineral selenium, which may help protect the body from heart disease and cancer.

Recommended serving size: 3.5-ounce fillet: 220 calories



Walnuts

Women who are looking for an easy way to get omega-3s on the go can grab a small handful of walnuts for an afternoon snack. "Although they are high in fat, most of it is polyunsaturated fat, which is considered a 'good fat' and, thus, they are fine to eat in moderation," says Rachel Brandeis, a registered dietitian in Atlanta, Georgia, and spokesperson for American Dietetic Association. Add some to your green salad, or give chicken salad a nutrition boost by adding ground walnuts.

Recommended serving size: Shelled, scant 1/2 cup: 344 calories



Tofu

Tofu is made from soybeans, which have been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease risk by lowering LDL cholesterol, says Brandeis. A diet containing 25 grams of soy protein and 50 to 60 milligrams of soy isoflavones can reduce LDL cholesterol levels. Tofu usually absorbs the flavor of whatever else you're cooking with it, so add it to a chicken or beef stir-fry dish, salad, or chili.

Recommended serving size: Firm, 3.5 ounces: 73 calories



Plums/Prunes

Known for their laxative effect, prunes are an excellent source of fiber and iron, and regular consumption has been shown to reduce LDL cholesterol in the blood. Prunes may also help protect you against colon cancer. If you're not a prune fan, plums are also a decent source of fiber and beta-carotene.

Recommended serving size: Plums, two: 34 calories Pitted prunes, five: 71 calories



Kidney Beans/Chickpeas

Like many legumes, kidney beans are a low-fat, high-soluble fiber protein source. These vitamin-rich beans also have a low glycemic index and are cholesterol-free. Add them to salads and chili, as they truly are almost a perfect health food. Both the canned and dried beans are equally high in fiber, but canned varieties are likely to have a higher salt content, so stick with dried varieties for maximum heart benefits.

Recommended serving size: Kidney beans, dry, 1/4 cup: 133 calories Kidney beans, canned, heaping 1/3 cup, drained: 100 calories Chickpeas, dry, 1/4 cup: 160 calories Chickpeas, canned, heaping 1/3 cup, drained: 160 calories



Barley

Whole-grain barley is rich in soluble fiber and insoluble fiber, which is good for combating constipation. A decent protein source, barley also contains a good supply of iron and minerals. Beware when choosing which barley to buy. So-called "pearl barely" lacks the outer husk, and thus, most of the nutrients are removed. Look for whole-grain barley cereals, or substitute whole-grain barley for rice and pasta side dishes once a week.

Recommended serving size: Dry, 1/4 cup: 151 calories

Published on BHG.com, October 2004.

Saturday, February 19, 2011

Updated guide for irregular heartbeat


Atrial fibrillation is an irregular heart rhythm that can reduce blood flow and increases the risk of stroke.
Doctors treating Canadians with atrial fibrillation have a new set of guidelines for recognizing and caring for these patients.

Atrial fibrillation is an irregular heart rhythm that can reduce a person's blood flow and increases the risk of stroke by three to five times, cardiologists say. It affects about 250,000 Canadians, according to the Heart and Stroke Foundation.The new guidelines in the February issue of the Canadian Journal of Cardiology seek to reduce the risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients.

It also introduces a new anticoagulant option thought to be superior to the current warfarin treatment for some.The new drug, dabigatran, is as effective and easier to use than warfarin, a November 2010 study suggested.Warfarin, also used as pesticide against rats, interacts with some drugs, and patients taking it must have their blood tested regularly to check that they are getting the correct amount.

"This new drug does not have all these constraints, so you take this pill and your anticoagulation level is regular, and is predictable," said Dr. Laurent Macle, a cardiologist at the Montreal Heart Institute and director of the institute's electrophysiology fellowship program.

While dabigatran has advantages, some patient safety advocates point to adverse reactions.
The drug is approved for use in Canada but it is expensive and isn't reimbursed yet by many drug insurance plans, cardiologists said.

The updated guidelines also recommend:

•"Pill-in-pocket" therapy for patients with infrequent and longer-lasting atrial fibrillation that occurs about every three or six months. These patients would replace daily anti-arrhythmic medication with a pill that is taken only when an episode happens, Macle said.

•A new rhythm control therapy called dronedarone that aims to ease symptoms in patients who are sicker with atrial fibrillation.

•Treatment with catheter ablation — cauterizing, or burning, an area in the left atrium of the heart that is responsible for the arrhythmia to prevent recurrences.

The guidelines include a new rating system and tools such as apps for doctors to use.


Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2011/02/18/atrial-fibrillation-treatment.html#ixzz1EPWxqdJi

Friday, February 18, 2011

Treatment for Chronic Fatigue Syndrom

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, also known as ME, should be treated with a form of behavioural therapy or exercise, say British scientists. Writing in The Lancet, they argue that the approach preferred by some charities, managing energy levels, is less successful.

A quarter of a million people in the UK have the condition, yet its cause remains unknown. Symptoms include severe tiredness, poor concentration and memory, muscle and joint pain and disturbed sleep.
This study looked at which treatments were the most successful. It compared CBT (cognitive behavioural therapy - changing how people think and act), graded exercise therapy - gradually increasing the amount of exercise, and adaptive pacing therapy - planning activity to avoid fatigue.

All of the 641 people who took part in the study had chronic fatigue syndrome, but were not bed-bound.
The authors say cognitive behavioural and graded exercise therapies were the most successful, both at reducing fatigue and increasing physical function.
"This study matters, it matters a lot.” Professor Willie Hamilton, Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry

With cognitive behavioural therapy, 30% of patients returned to normal levels of fatigue and physical function. They say that adaptive pacing therapy is little better than basic medical advice.
Professor Michael Sharpe, co-author of the study from the University of Edinburgh, said: "One of the difficulties in the field is ambiguity, what is the cause and most importantly, what is the treatment?

"The evidence up to now has remained controversial. The helpful thing about this trial is that it actually gives pretty clear cut evidence about effectiveness and safety."

But the charity Action for ME said the conclusions were exaggerated and questioned the safety of graded exercise therapy. Its CEO, Sir Peter Spencer, said: "The findings contradict the considerable evidence of our own surveys. "Of the 2,763 people with ME who took part in our 2008 survey, 82% found pacing helpful, compared with 50% for cognitive behavioural therapy and 45% for graded exercise therapy.
"Worryingly, 34% reported that graded exercise therapy made them worse."

The authors suggest that poor advice, such as suggestions to just go to the gym, could be responsible for bad experiences with the exercise therapy.  They said that the amount of exercise needed to be tailored to each person.
The Association of Young People with ME welcomed the findings.
It said it hoped that fears about graded exercise and CBT were laid to rest, and that the study needed to be repeated in children.

Professor Willie Hamilton, GP and professor of primary care diagnostics at Peninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry, said: "This study matters, it matters a lot. "Up until now we have known only that CBT and graded exercise therapy work for some people. We didn't know if pacing worked. This caused a real dilemma, especially for those in primary care. We didn't know whether to recommend pacing, or to refer for CBT or GET."Worse still, not all GPs have access to CBT or GET, so ended up suggesting pacing almost by default. This study should solve that dilemma.

NICE (the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence) said the findings were in line with current recommendations. Dr Fergus Macbeth, director of the centre for clinical practice at NICE, said: "We will now analyse the results of this important trial in more detail before making a final decision on whether there is a clinical need to update our guideline."

Beat the February Blues/Depression

Beat depression

Give to charity

Money can’t buy you happiness, but giving it away will lift your mood. Harvard Business School found that spending as little as £3 on others instantly makes you happier. A 2008 study published in the journal Science found that people were more content if they felt their money was having a positive impact on others, and not just themselves. Leave a bigger tip at lunch, or put a little something into that Christian Aid envelope.

Lovebomb your partner

Make your first text message or tweet of the day a slushy one. For this simple karmic act, known to pop philosophers as “paying it forward”, you can expect a good vibe in return. For ideas of what to write in your message, dip into Tweetie Pie: 140 Ways To Say I Love You (Orion, £6.99), a new pocket-book full of epithets such as “We didn’t speak much last night. We didn’t need to. I like that. xxx”.

Get singing

You don’t have to audition for Simon Cowell to feel the benefit: singing to yourself in the shower is an easy way to boost your levels of oxytocin, a feel-good hormone that scientists believe also acts as a natural painkiller. A report by the University of Sydney revealed that belting out a song has a palliative effect. “It lifts the mood, removes stress, and makes people feel better and happier,” says Sue Philips of the Alzheimer’s Society in Wales, which has set up singing groups for people with dementia. Reports suggest that singing can also improve cognitive function, reduce depression and boost the immune system.

Get the teas in

Psychologists at Yale University found that workers were more kindly disposed towards their colleagues, seeing them as more generous and caring if they had just held a warm drink in their hands.

“Physical warmth can make us see others as warmer people, but also cause us to be warmer – more generous and trusting – as well,” said the report’s co-author, Professor John A Bargh. So who will get in the next tea round, then?

Sit up straight

It can be difficult to summon up the enthusiasm to exercise at this time of year, but performing gentle exercises while sitting will help lift your mood. Wendy Oliver, a trainer who runs the Touch Studios in Bristol, says: “The answer is to engage in exercises that focus on enhancing posture. Our moods have a big influence on our posture and stance, creating tension in our bodies.”

Eat yourself happy

There is no end of advice at this time of year on what to eat to live healthier and get thinner. However, some foods will also help lift your mood. Ian Marber, from the Food Doctor nutrition consultants, recommends eating raw green beans, which are rich in magnesium, a nutrient that reduces emotional irritability and belligerence; the Institute of Psychiatry found magnesium deficiencies in patients who suffered from depression.

Low levels of vitamin B12 are also associated with mood swings; one serving of red snapper has three times your recommended daily intake. Something of an acquired taste, liquorice contains isoflavene, which helps control reactions to stress. Break out the Allsorts.

Go dancing

This is not recommended just for Strictly Come Dancing addicts going cold turkey. A quick foxtrot around the living room will release enough endorphins, the feel-good hormone, to take your mind off the bleakness of the weather. Former Strictly judge Arlene Phillips says: “Dancing isn’t just about the physical benefit – it makes you feel good, too. Watch people walking down the street: if they’re listening to music there’s a spring in their step.”

Go barefoot

Walking around the office in bare feet will give you a quick physical lift. Dr Liz Miller, in her new book Moodmapping (Rodale, £8.99), says: “Tired feet make you feel tired. By giving them new sensations, and allowing your toes to move, you wake up a part of the body normally enclosed and give yourself a reflexology session. Once your feet feel better, the rest of you will, too.”

Get flirty

If any excuse were needed, it is good to practise your chat-up lines. “Part of your brain’s hypothalamus responds to flirtatious encounters by producing the hormone dopamine,” says Dr Michael Green, a neurologist at Aston University. “Brain cells that store it are then primed to fire the feel-good chemical into your synapses.” And if your other half finds out, you have the perfect explanation.

Say it with flowers

A study by Harvard Medical School has shown that floral-scented candles can put a smile on your face. Researchers found that a votive or two can reduce anxiety, make you feel more enthusiastic and give your spirits a lift. A behavioural study also suggested that “morning people” felt far happier and more energetic after waking to a vase of fresh-cut flowers. That’s petal power for you.

Listen to the birds

Birdsong can help you through the gloom of shorter winter days, says the National Trust, which has launched an online audio guide to Britain’s best-loved birds. Trust ecologist Peter Brash says that listeners will feel better for hearing it. “Taking the time out to listen to five minutes of birdsong every day could be beneficial to our wellbeing – although there is no real substitute for listening to birds singing in the outdoors, and we’re never far away from birdsong wherever we are.”

A study of the mood-altering effect of sounds by Goldsmiths College, University of London, found that even a short burst of birdsong – or other “happy” sounds such as crashing waves and crackling fires – affects perceptions, creating the illusion that you are content in your surroundings and making the day seem more bearable.

To coincide with the Big Garden Birdwatch, the Telegraph has teamed up with RSPB to compile The Essential Guide to British Garden Birds, free inside The Daily Telegraph on January 29. Meanwhile, inside The Sunday Telegraph (January 30th) you will find a free CD of uplifting birdsong, The Dawn Chorus. For more details, visit telegraph.co.uk/promotions

Write a journal

Today is the day you need to focus on the good things in your life. Before bedtime, write down all the things you have to be grateful for, as well as all the things that went well over the course of the day. Effective journal-writing captures the essence of your thoughts, provides reflection, allows for creativity, sharper memories, self-examination, and spiritual direction for a more complete person. Doing this also helps you wind down, ensuring a better night’s sleep.

Professor James Pennebaker, from the University of Texas, who has carried out numerous experiments on the health benefits of expressing your thoughts and feelings in writing, found that journal-keepers produce less cortisol, a stress hormone, and demonstrate a more vigorous antibody response to bacteria and viruses. “Writing a diary is a chance to stop, stand back and look at your life,” he says. “Use the quiet time to make life-force corrections.”

Thursday, February 17, 2011

3 areas upon which to focus to delay aging

There are three areas to focus on in slowing the aging process.


DIET

* Stay active - burn 1,500 to 2,500 calories a day; activity is a big factor in weight control and digestion.

* Eat a varied diet - easy on salt and fats, increase carbohydrates and fiber; stay away from chemically processed foods.

* Eat small meals - avoid the coffee breakfast, sandwich lunch and big plate dinner; instead, have four or five smaller meals evenly spread out.

* Hydrate yourself - don’t dry up; drink six to eight glasses of water a day



ATTITUDE

* Have the right mental outlook - believe that a long, fulfilling life is realistic

* Be an optimist - don’t dwell on the negative; don’t be discouraged by occasional setbacks

* Stay in control - Self-sufficiency, autonomy and independence are critical to successful aging

* Maintain your creative spark - stimulate your creativity; read, study a new language, take an art class, tend a garden, learn a musical instrument

* Train your brain- Smart people live longer; train your brain

* Make yourself necessary - do volunteer work, care for a pet, do projects with grandkids

* Have sex - disregard the myths; new evidence says that physical causes (chronic illness, prescription drug use), not psychological causes, create sexual problems for the elderly. Have a robust sex life into your 90s and beyond.

* Sleep - get enough sleep; older people experience disturbed sleep; however, the real culprit may be inactivity. After exercise, older people fall asleep quicker and sleep longer.


EXERCISE

Start with short walks and work your up; optimal value comes with three half-hour exercise sessions per week at an intensity that increases heart rate, makes you sweat, but you can still carry on a conversation.

To accomplish the above, remember

* It’s going to take time

* Look for role models for encouragement - 80 and 90 year olds getting college degrees, etc.

* Don’t allow small failures to become excuses to quit


Happy 100th birthday—in advance!



Silence is golden

No one has a finer command of language than the person who keeps his mouth shut.


Sam Rayburn-US politician (1882 - 1961)

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Turmeric is a widely used spice appears to fight stroke damage

A drug derived from the curry spice turmeric may be able to help the body repair some of the damage caused in the immediate aftermath of a stroke. Researchers at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles are preparing to embark on human trials after promising results in rabbits.

Their drug reached brain cells and reduced muscle and movement problems.The Stroke Association said it was the "first significant research" suggesting that the compound could aid stroke patients.Turmeric has been used for centuries as part of traditional Indian Ayurvedic medicine, and many laboratory studies suggest one of its components, curcumin, might have various beneficial properties.However, curcumin cannot pass the "blood brain barrier" which protects the brain from potentially toxic molecules.

The US researchers, who reported their results to a stroke conference, modified curcumin to come up with a new version, CNB-001, which could pass the blood brain barrier.The laboratory tests on rabbits suggested it might be effective up to three hours after a stroke in humans - about the same time window available for current "clot-busting" drugs.

Chain reaction

Dr Paul Lapchak, who led the study, said that the drug appeared to have an effect on "several critical mechanisms" which might keep brain cells alive after a stroke. "This is the first significant research to show that turmeric could be beneficial to stroke patients by encouraging new cells to grow and preventing cell death after a stroke” Dr Sharlin Ahmed, The Stroke Association

Although strokes kill brain cells by depriving them of oxygenated blood, this triggers a chain reaction which can widen the damaged area - and increase the level of disability suffered by the patient. Dr Lapchak said that CNB-001 appeared to repair four "signalling pathways" which are known to help fuel the runaway destruction of brain cells.However, even though human trials are being planned, any new treatment could still be some time away.

Dr Sharlin Ahmed, from The Stroke Association, said that turmeric was known to have health benefits.
She said: "There is a great need for new treatments which can protect brain cells after a stroke and improve recovery.""This is the first significant research to show that turmeric could be beneficial to stroke patients by encouraging new cells to grow and preventing cell death after a stroke."The results look promising, however it is still very early days and human trials need to be undertaken."



Tuesday, February 15, 2011

A STD Love Story: Gonorrhea Takes a Piece of Human DNA Forever



Casey Chan — In the first instance of gene transfer between a human host and bacteria, Gonorrhea was recently discovered to have a human DNA fragment. What the..how the..huh? Supposedly, it's a relatively recent evolutionary event and scientists have no idea what it means. And though it's a pseudo love story between star crossed lovers, I'm actually scaring myself as I read more into it. Scientists say:

The finding suggests gonorrhea's ability to acquire DNA from its human host may enable it to develop new and different strains of itself. "But whether this particular event has provided an advantage for the gonorrhea bacterium, we don't know yet, " Seifert said, "The next step is to figure out what this piece of DNA is doing,"

It's like an organic terminator, learning from our sexual habits and then striking when we have the babies. Gonorrhea just got a lot uncooler (not that it was ever cool). [Science Daily]



High-fibre diet helps more than heart


Eat more fibre and you just may live longer.

That's the message from the largest study of its kind to find a link between high-fibre diets and lower risks of death not only from heart disease, but from infectious and respiratory illnesses as well.Fibre from grains was most strongly tied to the lowered risk in the study, but it is also found in fruits, vegetables and beans.

The U.S. government study also ties fibre with a lower risk of cancer deaths in men, but not women, possibly because men are more likely to die from cancers related to diet, like cancers of the esophagus. And it finds the overall benefit to be strongest for diets high in fibre from grains.

Most Americans aren't getting enough roughage in their diets. The average American eats only about 15 grams of fibre each day, much less than the current daily recommendation of 25 grams for women and 38 grams for men, or 14 grams per 1,000 calories.For example, a slice of whole wheat bread contains two to four grams of fibre.In the new study, the people who met the guidelines were less likely to die during a nine-year follow-up period.

The men and women who ate the highest amount of fibre were 22 per cent less likely to die from any cause compared to those who ate the lowest amount, said lead author Dr. Yikyung Park of the National Cancer Institute.

Fibre's benefits to body

The study, appearing in Monday's Archives of Internal Medicine, included more than 388,000 adults, ages 50 to 71, who participated in a diet and health study conducted by the National Institutes of Health and AARP.  They filled out a questionnaire in 1995 or 1996 about their eating habits.

It asked them to estimate how often they ate 124 food items. After nine years, more than 31,000 of the participants had died. National records were used to find out who died and the cause of death.
The researchers took into account other risk factors including weight, education level, smoking and health status and still saw lower risks of death in people who ate more fibre.

"The results suggest that the benefits of dietary fibre go beyond heart health," said Dr. Frank Hu of the Harvard School of Public Health, who wasn't involved in the new research but co-authored an editorial in the journal.
The evidence for fibre's benefits has been strongest in diabetes and heart disease, where it's thought to improve cholesterol levels, blood pressure, inflammation and blood sugar levels.
Fibre's benefits also may come from its theorized ability to bind to toxins and move them out of the body quicker. High-fibre diets can promote weight loss by making people feel full, which has its own health-promoting effects.

However it works, fibre may offer a prevention benefit against killers like pneumonia and flu, the new study suggests.The cancer benefit may have shown up only in the men because they're more likely than women to die from cancers related to diet, Park said.
Fibre is found in fruits, vegetables and beans. But fibre from grains was most strongly tied to the lowered risk in the study.
"That's what seemed to be driving all these relationships," said Lawrence de Koning of the Harvard School of Public Health, a co-author of the editorial.

Whole grains also contain vitamins and minerals, which may play a role in reducing risk, he said. For that reason, supplements may not be as effective.What does a high-fibre diet look like? A woman who wants to meet the 25 gram guidelines for daily fibre intake could eat one-third cup of bran cereal (9 grams), a half cup of cooked beans (10 grams), a small apple with skin (4 grams) and a half cup of mixed vegetables (4 grams).

To reach 38 grams, a man could eat all that — plus about 23 almonds (4 grams), a baked potato (3 grams), an oat bran muffin (3 grams) and an orange (3 grams).Experts recommend adding fibre gradually to allow your digestive system time to get used to it.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/health/story/2011/02/14/fibre-high-diet-death.html#ixzz1E2qdYVMo

Why is alcohol consumption falling?By James Morgan

Despite new evidence that more people are being treated in hospital for excessive drinking, the overall trend is that we are drinking less as a nation. Why?

It's difficult to open a newspaper without reading about the alcohol problems that exist in the UK.
Recent headlines include "Binge drinking costs NHS billions", "Hospitals reel as drink cases soar" and "Alcohol abuse to cost NHS an extra billion"

And this week, figures from Alcohol Concern suggest the number of people being treated in hospital for alcohol misuse has more than doubled in eight years.But behind these stories is an unexpected truth - Britons have been drinking less and less every year since 2002. Men and women of all ages are slowly curbing their excesses and drinking in moderation, according to the annual survey from the Office for National Statistics, which covers England, Scotland and Wales.

It suggests that heavy drinking is falling, abstinence is rising, and young people are leading the drive towards healthier drinking.The decrease among some groups even pre-dates 2002, with men aged 16-24 drinking 26 units a week on average in 1999 and just 15 units a week in 2009, according to the ONS figures.

"There is a received wisdom that we must be drinking more," says Neil Williams of the British Beer and Pubs Association (BBPA). Its own figures, which are based on sales and not self-reporting, suggest alcohol sales peaked in 2004 and have fallen by 13% since then. In reality, we see a fairly deep-rooted decline in alcohol consumption which dates back to 2004. That's not something you see acknowledged in the media."

It's frustrating that the true story is not getting out there, says David Poley, chief executive of the Portman Group, an association of drinks producers in the UK."With newspapers, the headline is always the same: 'Shock rise in binge drinking'. But you look at the figures, and you see alcohol sales are declining.
"It's a myth that we need to make alcohol more expensive [to stop people drinking]. These trends are being reversed on their own."

Historically, sales of booze rose and fell with the economy. Recessions in the early 80s and 90s were coupled with a slump in drinking. And the current downturn is having a similar effect. From 2008-2009, alcohol consumption in the UK fell by 6%.Despite perceptions, young people are drinking less But that decline started long before the credit crunch kicked in - 2004 according to the BBPA and 2002 by the ONS figures. So what happened?
"To a certain extent it's a mystery," says Mr Poley. "There may be multiple reasons. But around that time, the UK did see the launch of some major alcohol health warning campaigns."
In 2004 the Drinkaware logo started appearing on beer advertisements. The labelling of drinks bottles improved to make it clear how many units of alcohol they contain. And the health dangers of heavy drinking were increasingly highlighted by the media.

References to "binge drinking" shot up in 2004, according to Dr James Nicholls of Bath Spa University, who researches the social history of alcohol. "The media picked up on it around the time that the 2003 Licensing Act was being introduced - when all the talk was of '24 hour drinking'. And that's when the whole 'Binge Britain' thing kicked off," he says.

The Daily Mail ran a memorable campaign, featuring images of young women slumped on pavements and park benches. News stories were peppered with health warnings from groups like Alcohol Concern, Drinkaware and the Royal College of Physicians."They were very successful at making the health impacts of alcohol a news story," says Mr Nicholls.

"These days most employers are anti-drink” Graham Page

Alcohol industry expert

In reality, 24-hour drinking never took off. The average pub only opened 24 minutes longer after 11pm last orders was abolished, says Nicholls. But it didn't matter - the headlines had already been written. A new tone had been set for alcohol reporting. The message was that Britain was out of control.
The negative publicity not only led people to moderate their behaviour, it also created a new kind of social stigma around being drunk. The ONS survey notes that people may now be "less inclined to admit to how much they have been drinking".

Boozing was no longer such a badge of honour. And attitudes in the workplace began to change too, says Graham Page, an alcohol industry analyst.

"These days most employers are anti-drink. The six o'clock swill has gone in most places, apart from London," he says.

Cheap booze

Meanwhile, consumer forces were also at work to change our drinking habits throughout the last decade. Pubs were closing down, duty on beer was rising, and sales of cheap supermarket wine were rocketing.
The caricature of a "drinker" has slowly morphed - from lager louts downing pints to girls on the sofa, sipping Pinot Grigio.
It's hard to quantify how each of these micro-trends in pricing has influenced overall alcohol consumption, says Mr Page, but their net effect is that the price of a drink as a percentage of spending money is cheaper than ever before. So alcohol is cheaper, but we are drinking less of it - a highly improbable cocktail. But a look at the longer term picture shows that drinking has been rising steadily since 1947, and levels are still some way above those in the early 1990s.
So is the latest fall a victory for drink awareness campaigning?

Such celebrations would be premature, says Don Shenker, chief executive of Alcohol Concern.
"There are still 10 million people drinking above the government's recommended level. And 1.6 million dependent drinkers. These are the frequent flyers into hospital, and they are not changing their drinking habits," he says.
"It is very likely that alcohol consumption will rise again once the economy picks up. So government alcohol policy should ensure alcohol becomes less affordable permanently, not just in an economic downturn."
The health warnings are here to stay - and rightly so, as hospital admissions from alcohol continue to rise.
It will be a long time before any recent moves towards healthier drinking will be felt in NHS wards.



Monday, February 14, 2011

Happy Valentines Day

Supermarket chicken harbours superbugs: CBC


Chicken bought at major supermarkets across Canada is frequently contaminated with superbugs — bacteria that many antibiotics cannot kill — an investigation by CBC TV's Marketplace has found.CBC'S Marketplace tests 100 samples of chicken from across the country for superbugs. Marketplace researchers — along with their colleagues at Radio-Canada's food show L'Epicerie — bought 100 samples of chicken from major grocery chains in Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal.

The chicken included some of the most familiar label names in the poultry business.The 100 samples were sent to a lab for analysis. Two-thirds of the chicken samples had bacteria. That in itself is not unusual — E. coli, salmonella and campylobacter are often present in raw chicken.

What was surprising was that all of the bacteria uncovered during the Marketplace sampling were resistant to at least one antibiotic. Some of the bacteria found were resistant to six, seven or even eight different types of antibiotics."This is the most worrisome study I've seen of its kind," said Rick Smith, the head of Environmental Defence, a consumer advocacy group.

Resistance grows

The sampling results revealed that common illness-causing bacteria had turned into superbugs that are increasingly resistant to the usual treatment protocols.How did these bacteria become superbugs? Doctors and scientists told Marketplace co-host Erica Johnson that chicken farmers are overusing antibiotics — routinely giving healthy flocks doses of amoxicillin, tetracycline, erythromycin and ceftiofur to prevent disease and to make the chickens grow bigger, faster. A representative of the Chicken Farmers of Canada group denied that antibiotics are being overused. "I think there's judicious use that is going on," said Mike Dungate.
But it isn't clear what the industry means by "judicious use." The industry won't say how much antibiotic use is occurring, saying it doesn't keep track. The federal government doesn't track antibiotic use by farmers, and, unlike in Europe, there are no limits on the use of antibiotics in the feed and water given to chickens.While thorough cooking kills bacteria — including superbugs — most contamination happens before the chicken is cooked through improper handling. If there's contamination by superbugs, the worry is that consumers could ingest illness-causing bugs that are then resistant to much of the available spectrum of traditional antibiotic therapy.

For Canadians who think they're safe by purchasing organic chicken or buying chicken raised without the use of antibiotics, Marketplace turned up results in its sampling that might surprise those consumers, too.

Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2011/02/10/cons-supermarket-superbugs.html#ixzz1DyEYQ8XW

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Workplace Ergonomics

Some of you may not realize how unfriendly your workspace is to your body, while others of you have already started experiencing repetitive strain injury (RSI) from an improperly set up desk. A number of different factors can cause injuries (yes, even at a desk), and they may not always be obvious—for example, slouching and keeping your shoulders tense can not only cause pinched nerves in your shoulders, but even hurt your wrists. If you haven't given a lot of thought to the comfort of your workspace, it's probably time to give it an ergonomic makeover. Here are the most important things you'll want to go through and change—both in your office hardware and in what you do when you're working.


For the purposes of this guide, we're going to assume you're using a sitting desk. If you really want to go all-out, many people (including some of the Lifehacker editors) have found standing desks to be an incredible boon to their comfort, and there are tons of great DIY solutions out there. If you're looking for a big change, I'd recommend reading up on that too—though for now, we're going to focus on the more traditional sit-down workspace.

What Your Hardware Needs to Do

While you could go all out and build a custom ergonomic desk, all you really need to do is make a few changes around your workspace. Here's where you want all your hardware positioned, and why.

Your Chair

People have been talking about ergonomic office chairs like the uber expensive Herman Miller Aeron line for years now, but there's no need to go plop down a bunch of cash just to be comfortable. Nowadays, you can grab much cheaper ergonomic chairs from a place like Staples or even upgrade your old chair with some DIY fixes. Note that some things are DIYable; some are not. Here are the things you need to make sure your chair has:

• A comfortable cushion: One of the most basic and obvious things you need is a comfortable place to sit. A hard chair isn't going to do you any good; a proper office chair with a cushion is going to keep you much more comfortable. After all, you are spending hours at a time in this chair. Breathable fabric is great too, if possible.

• Arm rests: Again, this is something you probably can't DIY, but you should have some arm rests on your chair for when you aren't actively typing. They should be low enough that your shoulders stay relaxed and your elbow bends at around a 90 degree angle.

• adjustable seat height: It's a lot easier to adjust your seat height than it is adjust your desk height. You want to be able to adjust your seat so that your thighs are parallel to the floor and your feet are flat on the floor. You also want to have your arms at the height of the desk (or the part of the desk containing your keyboard or mouse).

• Adjustable back rest height: This is one of the first things to go in the cheaper office chairs, and it was one of the biggest mistakes I was making in my own setup at home. You should be able to adjust your chair's back rest not only up and down, but its angle as well. Generally, you want the angle to be pretty far forward to keep your posture up—the further back you put it, the more likely you'll be to slouch. You'll also want the back rest of your chair to have...



• Lumbar Support: You have probably heard this term a lot, but may not even know what it means. Essentially, our backs are slightly curved inward, meaning the backs of our chairs shouldn't be directly vertical. Instead, they should support our lower backs by coming forward. The graphic to the right illustrates the idea well: the left half is a chair with no lumbar support, the right image has this $10 support added on. Of course, you could just as easily strap a rolled-up towel or something similar on your chair, but you need that support if you don't want to mess up your spine.

• The ability to swivel and/or roll around: It's hard to DIY this particular feature, but a chair with wheels and the ability to swivel is actually more of a necessary feature than you may think. When you need to reach for items on your desk, you can put strain on your body—so widening the area you can easily reach (and see without turning your head) can do wonders.

Your Desk

Just plopping your mouse, keyboard and monitor on your desk is not going to give you a healthy working setup. Here's how to make sure everything's set up in the right position.

Mouse and Keyboard Placement



You want your mouse and keyboard to be as close together as possible, with the alphanumeric part of the keyboard centered on your desk. This means you want to pay attention to the keys, not the keyboard itself—most keyboards are asymmetrical, with the number pad on the right. Instead of putting the whole keyboard in the center of your desk, keep an eye on the "B" key. You want that to be directly in front of you and in the center of your desk (or, rather, where you'll be sitting at your desk).

Whether your desk has a sliding keyboard tray or not shouldn't be much of a problem, as you have both an adjustable seat (right?) that can put the keyboard and you can adjust your monitors in a myriad of ways (see below). If you do have a keyboard tray, make sure your mouse is on the tray with it, not on the desk itself. You want your keyboard and mouse to be at the height where using them causes your elbows to be bent at or near a 90 degree angle, so you aren't bending your wrists to type.

Monitor



While most monitors aren't super adjustable on their own, we've featured numerous DIY monitor stands that are ridiculously easy to build. I'm using the door stopper monitor stand myself, and it works perfectly. You want the point about 2 or 3 inches down from the top of the monitor casing to be at eye level. You also want the monitors to be about an arm's length away from where you're sitting.

The trickier half of the equation is to eliminate glare on the monitors. While some monitors can tilt, many can't, and you're likely going to solve this problem with strategic lighting placement instead of monitor tweaks.

Desk Height

As you're setting up all your hardware, you may want to take a look at this previously mentioned workstation planner. It will help you measure out the proper seat height, keyboard height, and monitor height for your setup, so you can double-check and make sure you've done everything right.

Everything Else

The last thing you'll want to make sure of is that the most important objects at your desk are easily reachable. You shouldn't have to reach for anything often, so use the space you have to store the things you need access to (note in the photo of my keyboard and mouse above, my Droid is the next closest thing). Everything else can go in drawers or other parts of the office. The swivelling and/or rolling chair helps with this: if your chair swivels, you have a larger space for which things are in direct reach.

You Need to Make an Effort

It doesn't matter how "ergonomic" your hardware may be, you still need to be pretty mindful of your body when you work or you'll never reap the benefits of your properly set up workspace. Here are the things you'll want to pay attention to every day to make sure you're being nice to your body.

Posture



We've talked about good posture before, and if you've done everything right up until now, you're in a fairly good position: your keyboard is directly in front of you and the right level for a 90 degree bend in your arms, and your monitor is at eye level so you shouldn't be craning your neck up or down to see. In addition, you should always make sure that you:

• Don't slouch: this is an obvious one, but is pretty hard for some of us to remember. I found the biggest problem for me was that my seat back was much too far reclined. You want to be sitting up, with your back at about a 100 degree angle to your legs. By setting my seat back all the way forward and making sure I lay back against it, I'm finding it much, much easier to avoid slouching.

• Keep your elbows close to your body and keep your wrists straight. This means you can't be reaching for stuff, as I mentioned before—if you find your wrists or elbows aren't playing nice, it's probably because your mouse or keyboard is in the wrong position.

• Keep your shoulders and back relaxed: tense shoulder and back muscles will cause all sorts of problems. Make sure they're relaxed, which is probably going to require you not using the armrests when you're typing. Your keyboard should already be at the right level where you don't need to use the armrests, even if it goes against your instincts.

Photo by Joe Loong.

Take Frequent Breaks

It's no secret that sitting in one place staring at the same screen all day is bad for you. You want to generally take at least a five minute break away from your screen every half hour to hour. You'll also want to take some time every 20 minutes or so for the 20-20-20 rule: Every 20 minutes, take 20 seconds to look away from your screen and at something 20 feet away from you.

The best way to make good use of your breaks (and remember to take them) is with the previously mentioned Workrave and AntiRSI, for Windows/Linux and Mac OS X, respectively. Both apps will notify you when its time to take a break, and Workrave will even suggest some good stretches to do to keep your body loose and RSI-free (though we've shared some of those with you as well). Previously mentioned EyeDefender will also help schedule some quick breaks that'll ease the strain on your eyes. It's something extremely simple you can do that will make a world of difference.

Avoid Eye Strain

Taking those breaks will help your joints and your muscles, but also help relieve some of the eye strain you get staring at your computer all day. Minimizing glare with correct monitor placement will also help, but there are a few tweaks and pieces of software that might help you out. The first thing to do is make sure you have ClearType turned on in Windows, and increase your monitor's refresh rate. I'm also a huge believer in programs like Flux, which will keep your monitor much more eye-friendly at nighttime (if you tend to work later into the evening).

________________________________________



Friday, February 11, 2011

Obeisity

The most recent data comes from an exhaustive country-by-country report on obesity from the Imperial College London, Harvard University, and the World Health Organization, which was published in The Lancet. A Body Mass Index (shown on the x and y axis above) is a measure of body fat based on height and weight. A score of 25 to 30 corresponds with being overweight (represented by the light tan box above), while above 30 is obese (the dark tan box). As you can see, Pacific islanders (purple dots) had the highest BMI levels. Most of Europe (green dots) appears to be overweight, especially men (those green dots below the dotted line).


For an even more comprehensive breakdown of data, the study provides a rather impressive (and somewhat mind-boggling) visualization tool for body mass index, cholesterol, and blood pressure for all 199 countries for gender and age.

Altogether, this means that one in nine people around the world are obese—highlighting the growing global problem with overnutrition and the urgent need to both increase physical activity and to eat healthier. What will it take? New dietary guidelines? Better instructional tool to visualize those guidelines? Or something else entirely?

Chart: Wilson Andrews and Todd Lindeman of The Washington Post, created with data from Global Burden of Metabolic Risk Factors of Chronic Diseases Collaborating Group.



Thursday, February 10, 2011

Reading on the Web


Dan Misener

It's a paradox. There's a ton of great stuff to read on the web, but generally speaking, the experience of reading stuff on the web is terrible.Chances are, if you're reading these words in a web browser they're surrounded by a bunch of extraneous junk: up top, weather and advertisements; to the right, related links and additional headlines; and inline, on the left, a photo of me.
The ads may help defray the cost of publishing this page, and the dozens of hyperlinks may drive traffic to other pages of CBC.ca, but none of these things really help you focus on the intended act of reading these words. Popups, superfluous sharing widgets, and overly-paginated articles all fit into a particular category of digital cruft that, as an homage to Edward Tufte, I call "webjunk."

Enter Readability.

Created by consulting firm Arc90, Readability began life as a free JavaScript bookmarklet with a single purpose: to eliminate webjunk. After adding it to your browser's bookmark list, a single click strips a web page of its formatting, laying it out as a single column of clean, readable text. Readability strips advertisements and other elements from web pages. I've been using the original incarnation of Readability for more than a year now, and while it's not perfect, it makes reading long articles and blog posts much more pleasant. It's earned a coveted place in the bookmark bar of all my browsers.

So, I was excited to learn that this past week, Arc90 launched a new version of Readability. The original free version remains, but a new subscription-based paid version adds time-and-device-shifting capabilities, and most interestingly, a novel way to support content creators by sharing part of your monthly subscription fee with them. In its developers' words, Readability has graduated from a "basic web reading tool to a full-blown reading platform."

First, time-and-device-shifting. I don't know about you, but this happens to me all the time: a friend or colleage sends a link to an interesting article or blog post, but I don't have time to read it immediately. The new version of Readability joins services like Instapaper and Read It Later in allowing me to save articles to read later, conveniently stripped of ads and clunky formatting. All three services sync across multiple devices, letting me access saved articles in a web browser, on my tablet, or on a mobile phone.

The ability to better manage when, where, and how I consume web content has almost completely changed the way I read.The ability to better manage when, where, and how I consume web content has almost completely changed the way I read. Now, when my wife emails me a link to a blog post about getting a French visa in the middle of the day, I can simply click "Read Later" and know that a clean, junk-free copy will be waiting for me on my iPad later in the evening, when I'll have time to read it carefully.

But for me, the most interesting new aspect of Readility is its payment system. In a blog post, Readability creator Richard Ziade says, "we wanted to leverage the platform to support the writers and publishers people enjoy on the web today. In other words, we wanted to tie a mechanism that supports publishers to the act of reading."

Here's how it works. Each subscriber pays a monthly fee (the minimum is $5 US, though you can set it for as much as you'd like). Thirty per cent goes to Readability's developers, and 70 per cent goes to web publishers, divided up based on each subscriber's reading activity. For instance, if half the articles I de-junkify are from cbc.ca, then cbc.ca gets $1.75 of my $5 monthly fee.

Micropayments

The model at work here is one of micropayments, and Readability's use of it is particularly interesting in an online publishing landscape that's largely ad-supported, or, like News Corp.'s The Daily, subscription-based. The optimist in me wants to believe these tools will be a meritocratizing force, with the spoils going to the highest-quality blog posts and articles.Despite generating a lot of buzz in the late 1990s, micropayments never really took off as a method for selling online content. It'll be interesting to see if Readability's pay-per-percentage twist will prove successful. Back in 2009, a company called Kachingle started a service with a similar model, and to be honest, I've never knowingly stumbled upon a Kachingle-enabled site out in the wild.

As a consumer, I love the flexibility that services like Readability, Instapaper, and Read It Later offer. In the case of the new Readability, I also get a warm fuzzy feeling knowing that in some small way, web content creators are compensated when I read their content. But it's not a perfect system. Attention and intention are notoriously difficult to measure online. Just because I click "Read Later" doesn't mean I will read something later. Just because I read something, doesn't mean I want to support the person who wrote it (Readability does provide a mechanism to undo contributions before the end of any calendar month).

The optimist in me wants to believe these tools will be a meritocratizing force, with the spoils going to the highest-quality blog posts and articles. The pessimist in me recognizes that the most popular content online isn't always the best content online, and worries that with the introduction of micropayments, these reading services will become crude popularity contests — or just another system for search-engine optimization (SEO) experts to game.

On the other hand, I wonder how publishers will react to this. Readability, after all, provides a service that strips out ads, charges a subscription fee, and keeps 30 per cent, all of this built on top of other people's content. Even if they get a cut, I can understand why some publishers might not like this situation.
Whether the new Readability turns out to be a success or not, I think it points to how reading on the web has changed. Today, I want my text on-demand, in the same way I want my movies, music, and TV on-demand. I want the things I read to fit around my schedule and the devices I prefer. I want to pick when, where, and how. And if it all possible, I want to avoid spinning, dancing, animated banner ads that keep me from actually reading.

(Dan Misener is a national technology columnist for CBC Radio afternoon shows, and one of the minds behind Spark, with Nora Young.)
Read more: http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2011/02/08/f-misener-readability.html#ixzz1Da2lOpbX

Friday, February 4, 2011

Mortality predictors in elderly people

In general, the findings of this study were consistent with those of the the previous


literature, showing that poor subjective and objective health, poor results in

various measures of physical functioning, low psychological well-being and

low perceptions of social support predicted mortality in older people. However,

some new findings emerged: 1) the association between self-rated health and

mortality was explained by diagnosed diseases, but not with performancebased

measures of functioning; 2) no single predictor of mortality from

performance–based measures of functioning emerged; 3) low life satisfaction

related to the present, in terms of zest and mood, was a more important

predictor of mortality than congruence representing the satisfaction with past

life; 4) the perceived non-assistance related social support was more important

predictor of mortality than perceived assistance-related social support in the

older women, and 5) social support was not related to mortality risk in older

men.

Self-rated health and mortality

Previous studies of self-rated health and mortality have shown that poor selfrated

health predicts subsequent death even when several sociodemocraphic

and health indicators are controlled for (Mossey & Shapiro 1982, Idler & Benyamini

1997, Benyamini & Idler 1999, Shadbolt et al. 2002). Nevertheless, in

most previous studies objective measures of health and functioning have not

been included in the analyses. When information about potential confounders is

based on self-reports, these confounders are likely to be influenced by individual

styles of responding and thus, be biased in the same direction as self-rated

health itself. Very few studies have included data from performance-based

measures, clinical examinations or laboratory analyses (Kaplan et al. 1996,

Simons et al. 1996, Jylhä et al. 2006).

46

In study I, conducted with a sample only containing men, self-rated health

was a significant predictor of mortality when performance-based indicators of

functioning were controlled for, but not when the number of diagnosed

diseases was included in the model. Jylhä et al. (1998) have argued earlier that

self-rated health is a personal, subjective summary of all the information people

have about anything they understand as elements of “health”. Jylhä et al.

(2006), on the basis of the findings that self-rated health showed a graded

association with frequently used biomarkers, concluded that self-rated health

also has a biological basis. When biomarkers were included in the model, selfrated

health still was a significant predictor of mortality.

There are also some evidence of gender differences in self-rated health and

mortality risk (Deeg & Kriegsman 2003), but a male-only sample did not allow

this issue to be studied in study I.

Physical functioning and mortality

Among the performance-based measures of functioning, poor mobility was one

of the strongest predictors of mortality (I,II). In earlier studies impaired mobility

has been shown to be a major risk factor for disability, falling, loss of independence,

hospitalization and mortality (Guralnik et al. 2000, Hirvensalo et al.

2000, Penninx et al. 2000, Guralnik et al. 2001, Stel et al. 2003).

Slow walking speed has been found to be related to several chronic

conditions and weakened muscle strength. In this study older people whose

muscle strength was weak, were at higher risk for death. Several other studies

have found also a similar association (Rantanen et al. 2000, Metter et al. 2002,

Snih et al. 2002, Rantanen 2003). The suggested pathways from disease to

muscle impairment include nutritional depletion, systemic inflammation, and

physical inactivity. Poor muscle strength could be a marker of disease severity,

which in turn is associated with mortality (Rantanen 2003). Decreased muscle

strength is also a risk factor for falls, which in turn may lead to higher mortality

risk. A recent study confirmed that strength is a more important predictor of

mortality in older people than muscle mass (Newman et al. 2006b).

Speed-related functioning, like slow tapping time has been found to be

associated with increasing mortality in older people independently of the

effects of muscle power and strength (Metter at al. 2005). Era (1987) found

higher means for tapping rate in 71-year-old male survivors than non-survivors

at a 5-year follow-up. These studies support the present finding that slow

tapping rate is related to higher risk for mortality.

In study II, low vital capacity was related to higher mortality risk. Earlier

studies have shown that reduced pulmonary function is an important predictor

of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (Sorlie et al. 1989, Sharps et al. 1997,

Schunemann et al. 2000). Respiratory functions are good indicators of health

status and especially the coronary disease related mortality. The association

between pulmonary function and coronary heart disease can partly be

explained by cigarette smoking, which leads to both lung impairment and

incidence of coronary heart disease (Marcus et al. 1989). In present study this

47

was not the case, as in the initial analyses it was shown that controlling for

smoking did not reduce the hazard ratios. Also, in this sample of Finnish 75-

year-old people, the percentage of smokers was very low, especially in women.

The main finding of study II was that the functions measured were related

to higher mortality risk to a similar extent, and thus no single dominant

predictive factor emerged. It was possible to draw this conclusion, because

several performance-based measures were studied simultaneously.

Furthermore, the application of the principal component estimation procedure

in the Cox regression model yelded a truer picture of the impact of an

individual’s functional status and mortality. The levels of the various functions

studied showed significant intercorrelation, indicating that a decline in one

function also contains information about the other physical functions of an

individual. A study by Heikkinen et al. (1993) found that in older male age

group (71–75-years) intercorrelations in measures of functiong were higher than

in younger age groups.

It could be argued that the older people with higher risk for death

represented the frailty phenotype. Frailty is a robust concept with the risk of

adverse outcomes being largely established by age 70 (Rockwood et al. 2006).

Ferrucci et al. (2003) have put forward hypothesis on the development of frailty,

according to which disease, disuse and ageing “per se” trigger a mechanism

that exhausts the redundancy of muscular and nervous backup systems, so that

the damage goes beyond the threshold of possible compensation and leads to a

measurable decline in physical performance and in the end, to death.

At the other end of continuum there is a group of survivors, whose good

level of physical functions may represent general vitality or robustness, thus

protecting those individuals from premature death. The explanation for this

could be found in their earlier lifestyle and partly in genetic influences. Recent

studies have suggested that genetic influences contribute to about one third of

the variation in postural balance, muscle strength and mobility in older people

(Pajala et al. 2004, Tiainen et al. 2004, 2005, Pajala et al. 2005, 2006).

It also seems that the protective effects of good physical functions are

partly additive. When these functions were studied univariately, the risk for

death for those in the lowest tertile was high, and when gathered together in an

index the information of different functions showed an even higher risk for

mortality for these individuals.

Life satisfaction and mortality

Life satisfaction has mainly been used as an endpoint in earlier ageing research,

providing a lot of useful information about its determinants and predictors.

Studies of the impact of life satisfaction on various health outcomes in an older

population are few, although this issue is particularly important in old age

when various deficits in health, functional capacity and social network

accumulate. Although many studies have found other indicators of

psychological well-being than life satisfaction to be highly related to lower risk

for mortality in old age (Maier & Smith 1999, Ostir et al. 2000, Penninx et al.

48

2000b, Danner et al. 2001, Levy et al. 2002, Giltay et al. 2004, Pitkälä et al. 2004),

no studies using validated measures of life satisfaction and mortality in older

people were located.

Life satisfaction index Z (LSIZ) (Wood et al. 1969), a well-validated

measure and designed especially for older people, was applied in study III. In

order to study the factor structure of LSIZ and the mortality risk related to its

different subscales, exploratory factor analysis was conducted. The analysis

yielded three factors. The first factor was identified as Zest, and it represented

satisfaction with present life and zest. The second factor was identified as

Mood, and represented present life satisfaction and mood. The third factor,

Congruence, represented past life satisfaction and congruence. This factor

structure has earlier been found in Life satisfaction index A, which is the

original, larger version of LSIZ (Adams 1969, Hoyt & Creech 1983, Liang 1984,

Shmotkin 1991). From these three factors Zest and Mood, representing

satisfaction with present life, were associated to mortality risk. The Congruence

factor, representing satisfaction in past life and achieving personal goals, was

not related to higher mortality.

It seems that old-old people perceive their satisfaction with the life they

are now living as more important than issues that are usually considered

important in younger age groups. There are similar findings in earlier study of

the life-lines of older people by Takkinen and Suutama (2004). Socioemotional

selectivity theorists also argue that when people perceive their time in life to be

limited, futuristic goals become less relevant and present-oriented, emotional

goals become more important (Carstensen et al. 1999, Cheng 2004).

Studies showing that optimistic attitude and feelings of hope are related to

better survival in old age (e.g. Giltay et al. 2004), support our finding. Positive

emotions may promote a more active social and physical lifestyle and also

motivation toward self-care (Scheier & Carver 1992). Older people with better

subjective well-being may also have better coping capabilities; optimists usually

avoid strategies like denial and giving up (Segerström et al. 1998).

Social support and mortality

Earlier studies on social support and mortality have mostly focused on

quantitative parts of social network (e.g. Avlund et al 1998). In study IV,

perceived social support was measured with well-validated instrument, the

Social Provision Scale (Weiss 1973, Russell et al. 1984, Cutrona & Russell 1987,

Törmäkangas et al. 2003), which measures the kind of support a person gets

from his or her social network.

Although there is much evidence of beneficial effects of social support on

the health of older people, the different subscales and their association with

mortality have not been studied earlier. Thus, the items of Weiss’s Social

Provision Scale were divided into two categories: assistance-related and nonassistance-

related (Cutrona & Russell 1987). Perceptions of poor non-assistancerelated

perceived social support, consisting of reassurance of worth, emotional

closeness, sense of belonging and opportunity for nurture, predicted mortality of

49

older women. Assistance-related social support, consisting of guidance (advice

or information) and reliable alliance (assurance that there are people who can

be counted on in certain circumstances) was not related to survival in the

women. This finding is in line with earlier studies showing that emotional

social support is more important to the health of older people. In fact, there

have been some studies showing that receipt of instrumental social support is

unfavourable for health outcomes, probably because underlying poor health

status that requires instrumental support; favorable effects have been mainly

demonstrated for emotional support (Seeman et al. 1996, Penninx et al. 1997).

Identity theorists argue that being imbedded in a social network is

protective because it gives the individual meaningful roles; these in turn

generate self-esteem and a sense of purpose in life (Thoits 1983, Unchino 2004).

Good social relationships also help older people to cope with different losses

that ageing may bring alone (Akiyama & Akiyama 1991). The absence of close

attachments and recognition of worth causes emotional loneliness and

depressiveness (Heikkinen & Kauppinen 2004, Taylor & Lynch 2004). The

feeling of being needed and valued is important; it gives one the strength to

take care of oneself. Those who are alone and forgotten, despite formal support,

are at a higher risk for death. Older women themselves also connect good social

relationships with their experienced health (Lyyra & Heikkinen 2006).

Differences between age groups

In the final models of study I the significance of certain predictors of mortality

varied between the middle-aged and older men: in the middle-aged group high

serum total cholesterol predicted mortality. In the older age group the variables

indicating poor physical strength and cognitive performance were associated

with higher mortality, indicating that the predictors of mortality in older people

are different from those predicting mortality in middle-aged people.

Low body mass index was associated with a higher mortality risk in the

older age group. Consistently with the studies by Grabowski and Ellis (2001)

and Landi et al. (1999) the result of this study suggested that a higher body

mass index might be protective in older people. In study I body mass index in

middle age was not related to mortality over an 18-year-follow-up. It is possible

that longer follow-up would have produced a different result, as in the study by

Yan et al. (2006), where the mean follow-up was 32 years; they found that those

who were obese in middle age had a higher risk for hospitalization and

mortality in older age than those who were normal weight.

A similar phenomenon was found regarding to serum total cholesterol. In

study I, higher serum total cholesterol was associated with increased mortality

in the middle-aged but not in older men. The results of several studies have

shown either an inverse or no relation between total cholesterol and mortality

in older people (Pijls et al. 1993, Krumholz et al. 1994, Chyou & Eaker 2000,

Brescianini et al 2003). One explanation could be that the men at highest risk

may already have died prior to the study. Some findings also suggest that

between older and younger populations the cholesterol metabolism may differ

50

(Chyou & Eaker 2000). Menotti et al. (1998) have found that out of 11 powerful

cardiovascular risk factors predicting mortality only five remained significant

when measurements were done 10 years later for 50-year-old men, suggesting

that their predictive power declines with advancing age. There is ongoing

debate on the use of lipid-lowering drugs in older populations and obviously

more randomised controlled trials are needed.

Differences between sexes

The pattern of the associations between physical functions and mortality was

similar in both sexes (II). The only difference was found in vibration threshold,

which was related to mortality in the 75-year-old women, but not in men.

Higher vibration threshold has been found to associate with several chronic

conditions, such as diabetes. Vibration threshold also correlated strongly with

number of chronic diseases in the women in this sample.

A significant association between mortality and social support was found

only in the 80-year-old women (IV). This is contradictory to the findings of

earlier studies (House et al. 1982, Kaplan et al. 1988). Studies performed

exclusively with older people have found that social support predict survival in

both sexes (Jylhä & Aro 1989, Seeman et al. 1993). Men tend to maintain close,

intimate relationships with only a few people, primarily with their spouses.

Being married has been found to be more protective for men (Berkman & Syme

1979). In this study the majority of the men were married, whereas most of the

women were widowed and lived alone. For the women living alone the quality

of social relationships seems to be more important than it is for men who are

married. Earlier studies have also shown that in women the social network and

contacts increase after the death of a spouse (Barrett & Lynch 1999, Lennartsson

1999, Pinquart 2003). In men, the situation is the reverse: becoming widowed

leads to a decrease in social contacts (van Grootheest et al. 1999).